United States v. Dakota-Montana Oil Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
Respondent, a North Dakota corporation, in making its tax return of income derived from its operation of oil wells in 1926, claimed a deduction from gross income of a depreciation allowance on account of the capitalized costs of preliminary development and drilling. The Commissioner refused to allow the deduction claimed, ruling that it was for depletion, not depreciation, and was therefore included in the statutory depletion allowance of 27%% of the gross income, which the respondent had also deducted.. §§ 204. (c), 234 '(a) (8), Revenue Act of 1926, c. 27, 44 Stat. 9, 16, 41. Having paid…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brewster v. GageSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Palmer v. BenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Murphy Oil Co. v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- V. Loewers Gambrinus Brewery Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
3Cited by160 opinions
- Hassett v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Helvering v. WinmillSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Anderson v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Helvering v. Wilshire Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Helvering v. Mountain Producers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.