Legal Opinion
BOR. OF OAKLAND v. Roth
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 12, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
28 N.J. Super. 321 (1953)
100 A.2d 698
BOROUGH OF OAKLAND, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
EMIL ROTH AND ELLA MAE ROTH, HIS WIFE, ALICE E. CASELLA AND CHARLES M. CASELLA, HER HUSBAND, GARRETT W. JUNTA AND ETHEL A. JUNTA, HIS WIFE, AND SHIRLEY TINTLE AND DONALD TINTLE, HER HUSBAND, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. INTERVENTION BY THEODORE D. PARSONS, ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 19, 1953.
Decided November 12, 1953.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. James M. Muth briefed the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- State Ex Rel. State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Abelson's, Inc. v. New Jersey State Board of OptometristsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. Communications Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Mansfield & Swett, Inc. v. Town of West OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gruber v. Raritan Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- People of Puerto Rico v. Superior Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960
- Pueblo v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960