Legal Opinion

Texas Co. v. Schram

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 1, 1936No. 8227PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice.

Appellee, O. H. Schram, sued appellant, the Texas Company, in the justice court for $146.22 as the commissions due on the sale of gasoline and petroleum products under his agency contract with appellant; and recovered judgment for $125. On appeal to the county court, appellee recovered judgment for $94.68; hence this appeal.

The litigation arose as follows:

Prior to May 13, 1931, appellee sold gasoline and petroleum products as the agent of appellant under an agency contract which provided that he would “personally pay the company on demand the sum due on any account opened by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ryan v. KentTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Kingston v. PickinsTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  3. N. O. Nelson Mfg. Co. v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Lange v. BinzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Marion MacHine Foundry & Supply Co. v. R. T. Harris InterestsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Warrior Constructors, Inc. v. Small Business Investment Co. of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Smith v. First Pasadena State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Ware v. HarkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Fleishhacker v. Portland News Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Warrior Constructors, Inc. v. Small Business Investment Co. of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API