Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fleishhacker v. Portland News Publishing Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1937Published

1DissentBailey, J.

In presenting this dissenting opinion it becomes necessary to set forth in detail the facts in the case which appear important and determinative, in order to give an adequate exposition of the law applicable to the negotiations between the parties to this litigation.

This action was instituted by the plaintiffs to recover from the defendant the sum of $46,342.72 and interest thereon from the date of payment of the principal sum by the plaintiffs in satisfaction of a judgment recovered against them in a creditors’ suit brought in the United States district court for the northern district of…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Linington v. StrongIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Olston v. Oregon Water Power & Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Speed v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  4. Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Smith v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API