Legal Opinion
Vick v. Bishop
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 19, 1949No. 5 Div. 459PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVINGSTON, Justice.
The bill is one to redeem certain described lands located in Coosa County, Alabama.
The question of primary importance on this appeal is whether the notice of foreclosure sale or the method employed by the mortgagee appellant in giving such notice is sufficient. Evidence as to the notice is found in the foreclosure deed which recites :
“Whereas, in and by said mortgage, said J. A. Vick was authorized and empowered, in case of default in the payment at maturity, of the debt secured thereby, to take possession of said property, and, after giving notice of the time, place and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dozier v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. of Alabama, Inc. v. Gadsden Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Appelbaum v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Jones v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Bardwell v. Town of ClintonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Siegelman v. Chase Manhattan BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Allen v. Globe-Democrat Publishing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Gulf Coast Media v. Mobile PressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Selman v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- State Ex Rel. Moore v. StricklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.