State v. Menard
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The defendant, Jerry D. Menard, was convicted after trial by jury of two counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault on a victim of less than thirteen years of age, RSA 632-A:2, XI. On appeal, he claims that the Superior Court (DiClerico, J.) erred in admitting the testimony of a rebuttal witness and in failing to exclude hearsay statements made by the witness during that testimony. For the reasons which follow, we affirm.
The defendant was indicted and tried on two counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault. Both indictments were based upon the complaint of a young female victim who…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- State v. FennellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- State v. WisowatySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- State v. BoyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Brown v. Cathay Island, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. McAdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- State v. RobertsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Transmedia Restaurant Co. v. DevereauxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- State v. RyanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.