Legal Opinion

Belcher v. Haskell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Evidence was given by the defendant Margaret Haskell upon the trial to the effect that she was a minor of the age of twenty years. No guardian ad litem was appointed for her. The judgment against her is, therefore, void or voidable depending upon whether the summons was or was not properly served upon her. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 202; McMurray v. McMurray, 66 N. Y. *252175; Jacobson v. Krekell, 223 App. Div. 440.) Whether the judgment is void or voidable is not before us in this case. The infant defendant must raise that question either through a guardian before reaching her majority or by her own…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McMurray v. . McMurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Jacobson v. KrekellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Krieger v. KriegerNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Greenberg v. SchilbCity of New York Municipal Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API