Legal Opinion

Krieger v. Krieger

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1950PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.

In an action for annulment between parties who, at the commencement thereof, had not attained the age of twenty-one years, an answer served in defendant’s behalf is sought to be stricken on the ground that it was unauthorized. Plaintiff also asks the court to appoint a guardian ad litem for said defendant to receive a copy of the summons and complaint in this action. One of the attorneys who has appeared for the defendant states that the defendant and his parents have informed him that the allegations of the complaint are not true and that they desire to oppose the action.

Subdivision 1 of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crouter v. . CrouterNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Leahy v. HardyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. Jacobson v. KrekellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  4. Issem v. SlaterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  5. Ward v. WardNew York Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Higgins v. BlauveltNew York Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API