Ross v. Long
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtKintzinger, J.
The defendant in December, 1932, executed and delivered to the Shenandoah National Bank of Shenandoah, Iowa, his three promissory notes aggregating $5,551. The record shows that H. E. Ross is the duly appointed, acting and qualified conservator of the Shenandoah National Bank, and as such is the holder of the promissory notes involved in this litigation. He commenced this action upon the notes, and asked for a writ of attachment. The defendant filed a motion, based upon, several grounds, asking for a dissolution of the attachment. The motion was overruled, and defendant appeals.
Some of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bank of Bethel v. Pahquioque BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Cadle v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Turner v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Carson, Pirie, Scott & Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burr v. Apex Concrete Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Case v. MurdockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Case v. MurdockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989