Legal Opinion · Dissent

Case v. Murdock

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1995No. 18503, 18505 and 18506Published

1Dissent

WUEST, Retired Justice

(dissenting).

The trial court appointed a receiver to consider the settlement offer made by two of Hickok’s directors pending before the corporation and also to consider “all other litigation in which the corporation and its shareholders are involved.” The appointment was made under the authority of SDCL 21-21-3 which provides, in pertinent part:

[a] receiver may be appointed by the court in which an action is pending, or by the judge thereof, in the cases where a corporation ... is unable to exercise its corporate functions because of continued dissention between or…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Herndon v. HerndonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Gross v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Fox v. FoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Rykhus v. RykhusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Dartt v. BerghorstSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API