Legal Opinion

Pope v. Scott

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 9, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Ellis. Fulton superior court. June 30, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.

1. There.being conflicting evidence on the subject of whether notice of a motion for a new trial was given, and also as to whether there was proper notice of the setting down of the case for a trial after a new trial had been granted, there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant an injunction to restrain the enforcement of the judgment *276entered upon a replevy bond given by tlie plaintiff in the bail-trover proceeding, because of an alleged want of notice in the particulars mentioned.

March 9, 1915. Petition for injunction. Before Judge Ellis. Fulton superior court. June 30, 1914. S. C.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marshall v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  2. Lauchheimer & Sons v. JacobsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Thomas v. PriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  4. Smith Bros. & Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Petty v. Piedmont Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Williams v. MitchemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Kennedy v. LinderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  4. Stewart v. HastyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  5. Household Finance Corp. v. Pugmire Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API