Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Hasty

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 9, 1948No. 31881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.

Code § 107-209, provides: “When the plaintiff in a trover suit has replevied the property and, on the trial of the case, fails to recover or dismisses his petition, the defendant, instead of suing on the replevy bond, may recover the property and its hire, or the sworn value placed upon the property in the petition.”

This provision of our Code was codified from the case of Marshall v. Livingston, 77 Ga. 21 (1), wherein the rule is thus stated: “Where an action of trover was brought and bail process was sued out, and upon the failure of the defendant to give the bond required, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marshall v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  2. Thomas v. PriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Simpson v. BrockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Petty v. Piedmont Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Seals, Armour & Co. v. StocksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vann v. American Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Bowman v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. J. I. Case Co. v. United Virginia BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  4. Lopez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API