Legal Opinion

Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Ruckus Wireless Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 31, 2020No. 3:16-cv-00186Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHRIMAR SYSTEMS INC, et al., Case Nos. 16-cv-00186-SI, 16-cv-00558- SI, 16-cv-00624-SI, 16-cv-00897-SI 8 Plaintiffs, 9 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY 10 RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC., JUDGMENT 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 144, 146 12 13 Before the Court are defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment. Dkt. No. 144 (Defs’ ‘760 14 MSJ); Dkt. No. 146 (Defs’ ’825 MSJ).1 Having reviewed the parties’ submissions, the Court hereby 15 GRANTS both motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. 16 17 BACKGROUND 18 Plaintiff…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Robert H. E. Frank, Jerry D. Mooberry, Tyrone G. Moreno v. U.S. West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API