Legal Opinion
Soukup v. Halmel
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided October 17, 1934No. 22363. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Jones
Bohumil Soukup instituted a suit in the superior court of Cook county against Anton Halmel and James Halmel to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when struck by an automobile belonging to James Halmel and driven by Anton Halmel, his sixteen-year-old son. The court directed a verdict in favor of James Halmel. A verdict for $5000 was returned against Anton Halmel and judgment was entered thereon. The Motor Vehicle Casualty Company, (successor to the Motor Vehicle Underwriters,) insurer under a policy issued to James Halmel covering public liability on account of the use or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lavine v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Indemnity Insurance v. JordanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
- American Exchange National Bank v. Chicago National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Union Indemnity Co. v. SmallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
3Cited by19 opinions
- Clemmons v. Travelers Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Konrad v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
- Rodenkirk ex rel. Deitenbach v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
- Henschel v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Hays v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.