Legal Opinion

In re Fasi

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 13, 1989No. 88-394PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The Belknap County Probate Court (Cushing, J.) found the petitionee “to be suffering from mental illness ... so as to create a potentially serious likelihood of danger to himself and *480others,” and committed the respondent to the secure psychiatric unit (SPU) of the New Hampshire State Prison.

In this appeal, the petitionee challenges his involuntary commitment to the SPU on four grounds: (1) that the probate court erred in finding that the petitionee was not justified under RSA 627:1 in using deadly force against Howard Denney; (2) that the probate court erred in admitting as evidence events…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Proctor v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  3. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. In re SanbornSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  5. In Re FieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Christopher K.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  2. In re B.T.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  3. In re PerleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. In re G.W.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2023
  5. In re K.C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API