Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance v. Dortch
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
The issue presented for review is whether the court erred in allowing Patricia Dortch’s motion for summary judgment and in denying the motion for summary judgment by Ann C. Dortch, Ann Hunter Dortch, Elizabeth D. Beswick and Central Bank of the South. Believing the trial court improperly awarded summary judgment in favor of Patricia Dortch, we reverse.
Provisions of an insurance policy which relate to the procedures that must be followed in order to change the beneficiaries under the policy are conditions which are inserted for the protection of the insurer, not to protect the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dell v. VarnedoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Cable v. Prudential InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Teague v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Widows Fund of Sudan Temple v. UmphlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Gray v. STATE CAPITAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.