Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mandel v. Myers

California Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1981No. S.F. 24217Published

1Dissent

BIRD, C. J., Dissenting.

I write separately because I join in part" the reasoning, if not the rhetoric, of my dissenting colleague.

The facts are clear. The Legislature has never appropriated funds to pay for the attorney fees requested in this case. In fact, the Legislature has specifically refused to appropriate funds for this purpose.

I am sympathetic with the majority’s desire to see this legally valid judgment honored. However, I am disturbed by the majority’s avoidance of the real issues by finding that the legal fees were authorized by the Legislature. All the objective facts point to a…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API