Legal Opinion

Fowle Memorial Hospital Co. v. Nicholson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 24, 1925PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The plaintiffs’ motion to cancel the alleged lease and to prevent exclusive control of the hospital by one of the defendants is based upon three propositions: (1) The making of the lease was ultra vires; (2) it was not authorized by a majority of the members of the company; (3) the defendant J. L. Nicholson was an officer of the com pany and by exercising a controlling influence over tbe other members acquired exclusive control of the hospital without substantial consideration.

1. The general rule is that a corporation possesses only such powers as are expressly conferred upon it or such as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McIver v. Young Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Cleveland Cotton Mills v. Commissioners of Cleveland CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Wing v. DillinghamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
  4. Beazley v. MaretCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1866

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Underwood v. StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Stern v. Lucy Webb Hayes National Training School for Deaconesses & MissionariesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
  4. GILBERT v. McLEOD INFIRMARYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  5. Warren v. Littleton Orange Crush Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API