Beazley v. Maret
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 107 — PETITION EQUITY CJITY APPEAL FROM GARRARD CIRCUIT COURT. OITED— 14 B. Mon., 201; Talbot vs. Pierce. Drake on Attachments, secs. 48, 49, 51, 54, 55, 56. MSS. Opn., Oct., 1856; Merrill vs. Bridgewater. MSS. Opn., Oct., 1866; Mosby vs. Taylor. 3ISS. Opn., Jan., 1857; Samuel vs. Dallam. 4 Met., 286-8-9. 1 Duvall, 344-5; Salter vs. Dunn. Civil Code, pp. 136, 137, 345, and secs. 221, 617.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE ROBERTSON
delivered the opinion op the court.
In October, 1862, the appellees, John Maret and several others, claiming to be creditors of the appellant, William H. Beazley, attached his real and personal estate, on the alleged ground that he concealed himself and was voluntarily in the lines of the Southern Confederacy. After constructive service on him as an absent defendant, the petitions were improperly taken for confessed, and judgments rendered for a sale of the attached property; and sales being afterwards reported, a distribution among the attaching creditors was adjudged. From…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Fowle Memorial Hospital Co. v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Beazley v. MershonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1870
- Beazley v. MershonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869