Legal Opinion

Myers v. Ensign Motor Co.

Clark County Court of Common Pleas

Decided July 1, 1918Published

1Opinion of the CourtGeiger, J.

Minor T. Ballentine and Clarence A. Ballantine each present a claim which they ask be allowed as a preferred claim against the funds in the hands of the receiver of the Ensign Motor Company.

The claim of each arises out of services performed as automobile salesmen in the employ of the insolvent corporation. All the services were performed within three months of the appointment of the receiver. Minor T. Ballentine’s employment was that of a general agent for the sale of automobiles within his territory, which included several counties, and for a portion *178of the time for which he claims wages, he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re LairdCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  2. In re City Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API