Dent v. Adkisson

This is the fourth appearance of this case here. On the first appeal, 184 Ark. 869, 43 S. W. (2d) 739, we held that appellants’ (who are also appellants here) exceptions to the report of sale under the mortgage foreclosure were sufficient, if sustained by the testimony, and remanded the cause for this determination. Pending the first appeal, appellants instituted an independent action in the Faulkner Chancery Court setting forth facts almost identical with those set forth in the exceptions to the report of sale considered on the first appeal, save that they alleged that appellee had been in…