Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kersh Lake Drainage District v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 8, 1941No. 4-6332 and 4-6474Published

1DissentHolt, J.

I cannot agree with the majority opinion. It is my view that the questions and issues presented on these two appeals were finally determined and adjudicated in the opinion of this court in' Johnson, et al., v. Kersh Lake Drainage District, 198 Ark. 743, 131 S. W. 2d 620, 132 S. W. 2d 658, aud later affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States in Kersh Lake Drainage District v. Johnson, 309 U. S. 485, 60 Sup. Ct. 640, 84 L. Ed. 881, 128 A. L. R. 386. The defense set up by Johnson in that case, for himself and all other landowners in the district similarly situated, was one of res…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kersh Lake Drainage District v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Cassady v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  3. Wisconsin v. TorinusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  4. Bank of Pine Bluff v. LeviSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District No. 1 v. HuntSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API