Citibank (Mid-Hudson), N. A. v. Rohdie
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdward S. Conway, J.
This is a motion by Bankers Trust Company, the defendant in the first above-captioned action and the plaintiff in the second above-captioned action, for an order: (1) dismissing the complaint in the first action, the foreclosure action of Citibank (Mid-Hudson), N. A. (hereinafter referred to as Citibank), for failure to set forth in its complaint the fact that the second above-captioned action is presently pending in this court, as is required under section 1301 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law; or, in the alternative, for an order (2) staying the above-captioned foreclosure…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Irving Trust Co. v. SeltzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Brandenberg v. TirinoNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Gibbons v. GroatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dollar Dry Dock Bank v. Piping Rock Builders, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Valley Savings Bank v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996