Bawcom, Charles Seldon v. State

OPINION ON REMAND FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

TIM TAFT, Justice.

On original submission, this Court, relying on Hams v. State, 1 held that the State’s actions before a motion to revoke probation (“MRP”) 2 was filed and capias was issued could not be considered in de termining whether the State exercised due diligence in apprehending appellant. Bawcom v. State, 24 S.W.3d 613, 615 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2000), rev’d, 78 S.W.3d 360 (Tex.Crim.App.2002) (designated for publication). Accordingly, considering only the State’s post-MRP actions, we held that the State did not exercise due…