Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 27, 1991No. 279-90PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appellant pleaded guilty before the trial court to theft on March 28, 1983. On that same date, after assessing a five year sentence, the trial court granted him probation. On June 27, 1989, the trial court revoked appellant’s probation. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment. Rodriguez v. State, 784 S.W.2d 582 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1990).

Appellant complained on appeal that the trial court had no jurisdiction to revoke his probation after the term had expired because the State did not exercise due diligence in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guillot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Langston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Hardman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Stover v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by81 opinions

  1. Moss, Jecia JavetteCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  2. Peacock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Brecheisen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. Wheat v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API