Legal Opinion

Beerman v. Honeywell International, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided September 30, 2024No. 2:23-cv-02427Unknown

1Opinion

In the United States District Court for the District of Kansas _____________ Case No. 23-cv-02427-TC _____________ KARLYNN BEERMAN, ET AL., Plaintiffs v. HONEYWELL INT’L, INC., ET AL., Defendants _____________ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiffs Karlynn Beerman and Mike Burgin sued Defendant Honeywell International, Inc., Doc. 1-1, alleging that Honeywell’s product—an autopilot that digitally controls flights—caused Dr. Martin Beerman’s, M.D. death. Honeywell moved to dismiss. Doc. 21. For the following reasons, Honeywell’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. I A A federal district…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API