Charles M. Fraley v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
The District Court dismissed plaintiff’s Federal Employers’ Liability Act 1 suit on the assigned ground that it lacked “judicial jurisdiction” because in its view defendant was not “doing business” in the Western District of Pennsylvania.
The issue presented is whether the District Court erred in failing to require defendant to answer plaintiff’s interrogatories designed to elicit the scope of activities of defendant’s offices in Pittsburgh and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in view of the critical impact of such activities on the question as to whether…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Scophony Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Peterson v. Spartan Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Max Daetwyler Corp., a New York Corporation v. R. Meyer, a West German Corporation. Appeal of Rolf MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Central Operating Company v. Utility Workers of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.