Legal Opinion

Cunningham, Tallman, Pennington, Inc. v. Case-Hoyte Color Printers

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 3, 1985No. 70008PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Banke, Chief Judge.

The appellant, Cunningham, Tallman, Pennington, Inc., brought suit against “Case-Hoyte Color Printers” for breach of contract. “Case-Hoyt Atlanta Corporation” filed an answer and moved to dismiss the complaint on the basis that “Case-Hoyte Color Printers” was neither a legal entity nor a trade name for “Case-Hoyt Atlanta Corporation.” Thereafter, appellant moved to amend its complaint by substituting “Case-Hoyt Atlanta Corporation” for “Case-Hoyte Color Printers” as the named defendant. This appeal is from an order denying the motion to amend and granting the motion to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Block v. Voyager Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc. v. KetchamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Atlanta Veterans Transportation, Inc. v. WestmorelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. London Iron & Metal Co. v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tri-County Ice and Fuel Co. v. Palmetto Ice Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Northgate Village Apartments v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Miller v. U. S. Shelter Corp. of DelawareCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Abbott v. GillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Motorcycle Stuff, Inc. v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API