Legal Opinion

People v. Tyson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1985No. 73774, (Calendar No. 25)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.

We granted leave to appeal in this case to decide whether the state or federal prohibition against double jeopardy should have barred defendant’s retrial on armed robbery and felony-firearm charges following a mistrial granted at his request, and whether the prosecutor’s closing argument was so prejudicial to defendant that his conviction on those charges must be reversed. We answer no to the first question and yes to the second, and therefore reverse defendant’s conviction.

I

Defendant Schweidel Tyson and another man, Tommy Lee Forrest, were charged with armed robbery and possession of a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. People v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. HowardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. People v. SterlingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. DawsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. DobbenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API