Davis v. Crozier & Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Moore, J., Anderson, 1922. Action by T. R. Davis against W. H. Crozier & Co., in which the State Bank & Trust Co. intervened. From a directed verdict for plaintiff, the intervener appeals.
Read the full summary
Before Moore, J., Anderson, 1922. Action by T. R. Davis against W. H. Crozier & Co., in which the State Bank & Trust Co. intervened. From a directed verdict for plaintiff, the intervener appeals. Former appeals in this case will be found in 121 S. C., 99; 113 S. E, 377. cites: -Title transferred by Crosier can be transferred by the one to whom he transferred and it makes no difference that the transfer was back to the original owner: 72 S. C., 450; 82 S. C., 471; 4 R. C. B., 32-4; B. R. A., 1915B, 537.
1Concurrence
Christie BenET, A. A. J.
(concurring) : The plaintiff, Davis, brought this action against the defendant, W. H. Crozier & Co., asking payment for certain commission alleged to be due. Crozier & Co. were grain dealers in Nashville, and Davis was a merchandise broker in Anderson, at the time the suit was commenced. The plaintiff, on July 6, 1920, had attached 60 bags of oats, which were part of a consignment of three cars of oats shipped by Crozier & Co. to R. W. Pruitt & Son, merchants at Anderson. The State Bank & Trust Company of Nashville, Tenn., intervened in the action and claimed to be the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Davis v. Crozier & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1921