Legal Opinion
Davis v. Crozier & Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided August 1, 1921No. 10703PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Before Gary, Anderson, 1920. Action by T. B. Davis against W. H. Crozier & Co., in which State Bank & Trust Co. intervened and claimed the attached property. From directed verdict in favor of the intervener the plaintiff appeals. cites: Consignee not entitled to goods until draft is paid: 72 S. C., 454. Transfer back to consignee, revested title in them: 4 R. C. L., 32. cite: Verdict properly directed: 105 S. C., 128; 115 S. C., 137; 6 A. L. R., 234.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Fraser.
The record shows:
“This action was brought in July, 1920. Defendant, a foreign corporation, doing business at Nashville, Tenn., shipped a carload of oats to R. W. Pruitt & Son at Anderson, S. C. The shipment was what is commonly known as ‘order notify’ shipment; the draft for the purchase price of the oats being attached to the bill of lading and sent to a local bank for collection. The draft was not paid, and the oats were reconsigned to Augusta, Ga.
“On July 7, 1920, at the instance of plaintiff, the Sheriff entered the car in which…
2Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Allen, Inc. v. ISLAND CO-OP. ASS'N, LTD.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
- Charles R. Allen, Inc. v. Island Co-Operative Services Co-Operative Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- Charles R. Allen, Inc. v. Island Cooperative Services Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
- Davis v. Crozier & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923