Legal Opinion

Thompson-Starrett Co. v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel M. Gold, J.

Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary injunction and defendants’ cross motion to ' dismiss the complaint are before the court for determination.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff is and was a general contractor, specializing in large and substantial construction contracts ‘ ‘ including relatively few but large and varied construction projects that in the summer of 1953 defendants’ representatives audited plaintiff’s records for the purpose of determining whether a claim should be asserted against plaintiff for a deficiency in sales tax payments due, as the result of purchases of personal…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Rockland Light and Power Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Socony-Vacuum Oil Company, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Saltser & Weinsier, Inc. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gordon v. GerosaNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Marasse v. BuchmuellerNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API