Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Gerosa

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAbox Steuer, J.

Defendants are fiscal officers of the city. They move to dismiss the complaint on various grounds. The plaintiffs are agents in the live poultry business. As such they receive from their principals birds for sale, sell and deliver them to slaughterhouses. In so doing they put the birds in coops. The complaint alleges that these coops are bought by plaintiffs and are not returned to them by the purchasers. Defendants have asserted the right to assess sales taxes against defendants on the purchase price of the coops and have assessed such taxes. The complaint further alleges that plaintiffs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richfield Oil Corp. v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. Socony-Vacuum Oil Company, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. JosephNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Thompson-Starrett Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. CC&F Buffalo Development Co. v. TullyNew York Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API