Legal Opinion

Petition of Cmax, Inc. v. Hall

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 30, 1961No. 17227PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Circuit Judge.

In this proceeding petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus against the respondent Judge to vacate an order requiring the petitioner, as plaintiff in an action pending in the district court above mentioned, by amendment to its complaint, or by bill of particulars, to furnish the defendant in that case certain specified information.

The petition for the writ discloses that plaintiff’s complaint in the district court alleged that petitioner was operating under the regulations of the Civil Aeronautics Board, as an indirect air carrier engaged in the transportation of property as an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  5. Vecchia v. Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API