Legal Opinion

DiLucente Corp. v. Pennsylvania Roofing Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1995PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order of the trial court which denied DiLucente Corporation’s (DiLucente) motion for a preliminary injunction which sought to enjoin an arbitration hearing. We affirm.

The underlying action arose from a contract dispute between a general contractor, DiLucente, and a subcontractor, Pennsylvania Roofing Co., Inc., also known as Pennsylvania Roofing Systems, Inc. (Roofing), relative to construction work performed by the latter pursuant to a contract dated November 1, 1993.- The contract included an arbitration clause, which reads in pertinent part:

ARBITRATI…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. John G. Bryant Co. v. Sling Testing & Repair, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Soja v. Factoryville Sportsmen's ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. PBS Coal, Inc. v. Hardhat Mining, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Hassler v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Hoffman v. GekoskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smith v. Cumberland Group, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Scopel v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. COM. EX REL. CORBETT v. SnyderCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Cappiello v. DucaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Pennsylvania Orthopaedic Society v. Independence Blue CrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API