Legal Opinion

Echevarria v. Texas Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided February 17, 1940No. 3PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIELDS, District Judge.

Motions (1) for summary judgment under Rule 56(b), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c; and (2) for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c). A consideration of these motions involves a review of the record of the case.

October 10, 1931, Teodoro Echevarria was employed by defendant in the capacity of oiler as a member of the crew of the motor vessel Texaco #145. On that day while the motor vessel was at sea Echevar-. ria was asphyxiated by exposure to gas fumes while engaged in the performance of duties assigned to him and died almost immediately without leaving a will.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Mitchell v. OvermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Van Doren v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Charles L. Longbottom and Nancy Sue Chapman v. Roy Ralph Swaby, a Minor, by His Next Friend, Harold F. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Deupree v. LevinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  3. Overfield v. Pennroad CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Yorden v. FlasteDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1974
  5. Klee v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API