Legal Opinion

Clement v. Gomez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 6, 2002No. 01-16088PublishedCited by 198 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SNEED, Circuit Judge.

California state prison warden James Gomez and other prison officials appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment. Inmates Frank Clement, Arturo Chavez and Larry Caballero sued the officials for violating their Eighth Amendment rights, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The inmates asserted two claims of cruel and unusual punishment arising out of an incident in 1995 when the officials used pepper spray to quell a fight between two other prisoners, and the pepper spray vapors drifted into the plaintiff inmates’ cells. These claims alleged…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by198 opinions

  1. Edward Furnace v. Paul SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Clement v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. J W v. Birmingham Bd. of Educ.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Grenning v. KlemmeDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2014
  5. Hendon v. RamseyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2007

193 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API