Legal Opinion

Baer v. Gotham Craftsman Ltd.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 10, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Orders dated July 1, 1991 reversed, with $10 costs, tenants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the petitions are denied and landlord’s motion for leave to amend the petitions is granted. The amended petitions, dated May 14, 1991, shall be deemed served in the form annexed to landlord’s moving papers, and tenants may serve amended answers within 20 days of this order.

Order dated June 30, 1991 reversed, without costs, and landlord’s motion granted to the extent of dismissing tenants’ respective counterclaims for reimbursement of rent previously paid.

These are summary…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lower Manhattan Loft Tenants v. New York City Loft BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Jackson v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1976
  3. Rosgro Realty Co. v. BraynenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1972
  4. Barbour v. Hospital for Special SurgeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. People ex rel. Upchurch v. GittlesonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commercial Hotel, Inc. v. WhiteAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2002
  2. Schwartz v. TorrenzanoNew York Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API