Legal Opinion

Favia v. Indiana University of Pennsylvania

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 13, 1993No. 93-3051PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, Indiana University of Pennsylvania (“I.U.P” or the “University”), I.U.P. Director of Athletics Frank Cignetti, and I.U.P. President Lawrence Pettit1 appeal an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania denying their motion to modify a preliminary injunction. The injunction requires them to reinstate two varsity women’s sports programs, field hockey and gymnastics. It resulted from a class action filed by appellees, Dawn Favia, Wendy Schandelmeier, Kim Dalcamo, and Amy Phaehler,2 members of the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pederson v. Louisiana State UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1996
  2. Franks Ex Rel. H.B.L. v. Kentucky School for the DeafDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1996
  3. Multi-Channel TV Cable Co. v. Charlottesville Quality Cable Operating Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  4. Favia v. Indiana University Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. RodgerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API