Legal Opinion

Moskowitz v. Davis

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 16, 1934No. 6527PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

The appellant, Louis Moskowitz, a voluntary bankrupt, set forth in his schedules three contracts in force between himself and Sun-Life-Assurance Company of Canada, herein called the company. Therein they wore described as “Insurance Policies” and were claimed as exempt under Ohio General Code, § 9394. 1 His trustee petitioned for an order which was granted by the referee, requiring the bankrupt to turn over these contracts. Appellant then filed a petition for review, which the court dismissed, at the same time confirming the turnover order.' "Whereupon the bankrupt…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re WeickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
  2. Curtis v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Le GierseSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Fogel v. BangsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
  3. In Re PowerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  4. Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1939
  5. In Re WalshDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API