Moskowitz v. Davis
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
The appellant, Louis Moskowitz, a voluntary bankrupt, set forth in his schedules three contracts in force between himself and Sun-Life-Assurance Company of Canada, herein called the company. Therein they wore described as “Insurance Policies” and were claimed as exempt under Ohio General Code, § 9394. 1 His trustee petitioned for an order which was granted by the referee, requiring the bankrupt to turn over these contracts. Appellant then filed a petition for review, which the court dismissed, at the same time confirming the turnover order.' "Whereupon the bankrupt…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re WeickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Curtis v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
3Cited by9 opinions
- Helvering v. Le GierseSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Fogel v. BangsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- In Re PowerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1939
- In Re WalshDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.