Legal Opinion
Firestone Laser & Manufacturing LLC v. Bristow
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 9, 2022No. 4:21-cv-01772Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION FIRESTONE LASER & CASE NO. 4:21-CV-01772-AMK MANUFACTURING LLC, Plaintiff, MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMANDA M. KNAPP vs. MICHAEL BRISTOW, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant. Pending before the Court is a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (“Motion”) filed by Defendant Michael Bristow (“Bristow”) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 12(c). (ECF Doc. 18.) Plaintiff Firestone Laser & Manufacturing, LLC (“Firestone”) filed a brief in opposition (ECF Docs. 19, 20) and Bristow filed a reply (ECF Doc. 22). For the reasons that follow,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Joe D'Ambrosio v. Carmen MarinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- David Gavitt v. Bruce BornCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.