Legal Opinion
Fahed v. Ayesh
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 15, 2017No. 16-748PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKyzar,j.
LThe plaintiff, Ali Fahed, appeals from a trial court judgment awarding him $11,000.00 in unpaid wages, denying his claim for penalties, and awarding him $1,500.00 in attorney fees. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment.
DISCUSSION OF THE RECORD
Fahed and his wife, Amena Safi, filed suit against the defendants, ASM Food, Inc. (ASM) and Fayz Ayesh, alleging causes of action under the Louisiana Wage Payment Act, the Fair Labor and Standards Act, the Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, and for causes of action sounding in contract and tort. However, the appeal…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Day v. AllenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- STATE, DOTD v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Carriere v. Pee Wee's Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Beard v. Summit InstituteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Badon v. Berry's Reliable Resources, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
- Kira Reaver v. Degas House, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2023
- Valentino v. Heart & Vascular Associates of Acadiana, P.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Vernon A. Valentino, M.D. v. Heart and Vascular Associates of Acadiana, P.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017