Logue v. Leis
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Gorman, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Derek Logue appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for reclassification under R.C. 2950.09(F)(2) from a sexual predator to a sexually oriented offender. In one assignment of error, he contends that R.C. 2950.09(F)(2) violates due process and equal protection of the law because it places the burden of persuasion on the offender to demonstrate that he is unlikely to reoffend. We disagree.
{¶ 2} In 2001, Logue pleaded guilty to a sexually oriented offense in Alabama, where he served three years in prison. Solely as the result of his…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Phipps v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Arias v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Phipps v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Wolf v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2021