Ray v. Blockbuster, Inc.

¶ 18. Because I believe the majority has misconstrued Wilson v. Allday, 487 So.2d 793 (Miss.1986), I respectfully dissent.

*427¶ 19. The majority cori*ectly states the holding of Wilson. However, the opinion fails to correctly apply the law to the facts. First, the Wilson court framed the issue as follows:

whether a lessee would be liable to a third party for injuries received on property incidental to (but not on) demised property (common area-parking lot) which lessor had agreed to maintain in good repair. An examination of the relevant law would indicate that the liability of the lessee would…