Legal Opinion

Farrar v. Teicholz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 28, 1991PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal *675injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Burrows, J.), dated December 18, 1989, which granted the defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered January 11, 1990, which dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as granted the motion of the defendant The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company for summary judgment is dismissed;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Solomon v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Putnam v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Boltax v. Joy Day CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Millman v. Citibank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Boudreau-Grillo v. RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Kaufman v. Man-Dell Food Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Figueroa v. TsoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Doe v. Cloverleaf MallDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1993

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API