Legal Opinion
Keelean v. Central Bank of the South
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 7, 1989No. 87-689, 87-690PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This is an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Rule 5(a), A.R.App.P., from an order of the Circuit Court for Jefferson County denying defendants' motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We affirm.
In November 1984, Holdco of Pinellas County, Inc. ("Holdco"), a Florida corporation, executed and delivered to Central Bank of the South ("Central Bank"), an Alabama banking corporation, a promissory note with a principal amount of $4,000,000. All negotiations regarding the promissory note took place either via telephone between representatives of Holdco and Central Bank, or in Florida…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Outokumpu Engineering Enterprises, Inc. v. Kvaerner EnviroPower, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1996
- Professional Ins. Corp. v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- High Life Sales Co. v. Brown-Forman Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Ex Parte Auto-Owners Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Ex Parte Dill, Dill, Carr, Stonbraker & Hutchings, PCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.