Legal Opinion

State v. Matelski

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 20, 2001No. C1-00-660PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge. *

Appellant Scott Matelski challenges his conviction for aiding and abetting a drive- by shooting in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.66, subd. le(b) (1998) and aiding and abetting a crime committed for the benefit of a gang in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.229, subd. 2 (1998). Because we conclude that there was sufficient evidence to convict Matelski and the district court properly admitted gang evidence to prove that Matelski aided and abetted his fellow gang member in committing the crime, we affirm. But we modify Matelski’s sentence because he was improperly…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. NorgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. State v. OstremSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. State v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Lopez-RiosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. State v. MartinezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. State v. CarilloCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. State v. Lopez-RiosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API