Legal Opinion
Mamo Transportation, Inc. v. Williams
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 13, 2008No. 08-29PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jim Gunter, Justice.
This appeal arises from a decision of the Board of Review of the Arkansas Department of Workforce Services (the Board) finding that Appellant Mamo Transportation, Inc. (Mamo) is required to pay unemployment insurance taxes for services performed by drivers for wages because Mamo failed to meet the three-prong test set out in Ark. Code Ann. § ll-10-210(e) (Supp. 2007). We affirm the Board’s decision.
Mamo is a Nevada corporation that provides a “drive-away” service in which it transports larger vehicles from a point of origin to a point of destination. Mamo is headquartered…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Carpetland U.S.A., Inc. v. Illinois Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- O'Hare-Midway Limousine Service, Inc. v. BakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Texarkana School District v. ConnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Employment Security Commission of Wyoming v. Laramie Cabs, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Vermont Institute of Community Involvement, Inc. v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Garrett v. Dir.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Hortica-Florists' Mutual Ins. v. Pittman Nursery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Daniel JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Stokes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Bellemere v. Cable-Dahmer Chevrolet Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.