Legal Opinion

Kloss v. Wylezalek

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1904PublishedCited by 8 opinions

' Writ op Error to the Circuit Court of Randolph county; the Hon. B. R. Burroughs, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkin

Emanuel Wylezalek was the owner of the north-west quarter of the south-west quarter and the west fractional half of the north-west quarter of section 24, etc. He, together with his wife, Michalena, mortgaged both tracts to plaintiff in error, releasing, we assume, their right of homestead, which, however, is immaterial in the decision of this case. Afterwards the husband died intestate, leaving surviving him Michalena,' his widow, and six children. The widow gave a second mortgage to plaintiff in. error on the same land. She, of course, had no right in the fee at that time which she could…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. SackettIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Titman v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Cabeen v. MulliganIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Shepard v. BrewerIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Buck v. ConlogueIllinois Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peck v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Rosenbaum v. RosenbaumAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Williamson Investment Co. v. WilliamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Wagenbach v. PHI Financial Services, Inc. (In Re Wagenbach)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 1999
  5. Dinquel v. DaccoIllinois Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API