Banda v. Banda
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice.
While “the order allowing [temporary] alimony shall be subject to revision by the [trial] court at any time” (Code, § 30-204; Coffee v. Coffee, 101 Ga. 787 (28 S. E. 977); Wester v. Martin, 115 Ga. 776, 42 S. E. 81), the rule is different as to decrees for permanent alimony. After a decree for permanent alimony has become absolute, there is no authority given under the law by which a trial court is empowered to abrogate or modify the obligation imposed by the decree, unless such a right has been reserved by consent of the parties in the final decree itself. Hardy v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Coffee v. CoffeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Wilkins v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Gilbert v. GilbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Hardy v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Deaderick v. DeaderickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Burton v. FurcronSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Roberts v. MandevilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Zuber v. ZuberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Fricks v. FricksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Burch v. KenmoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.